Post by The Ninevite on Jun 17, 2024 11:53:04 GMT -8
1944AD uses M. Clark and O. Thyen's Pocket Oxford Duden German Dictionary.
Deuton German is a legal standard for educated grammar in the land of the Rhone River, and fans of Ronald "Dutch" Reagan may remember his Moscow Summit arguments and musings on the difference between "German" and "Dutch". "Deutschland" and the name of its language find their etymological roots in Hebrew, and specifically the speech is named after the Mosaic book of Deuteronomy. The stately Garmin of Berlin are quite famous for their attachment to the law. A German, or a Garmin, as described in Tacitus' book "Germania" speaks Duetsch. The designation of his race is "German", and his grammatical or rhetorical language is "Duetsch". Also, from the name of the Book of Deuteronomy, English gets its word "duty". A duty is a requirement, neither the duty itself nor the word for duty in either English or German is related to the words for work or for labor. A duty is to the state, and just as duty also applies to the Levites, so do Levitical requirements apply to both the state per se (members of the government), and to the state as such (all census worth members of the country's population). Job, an Israelite prophet, is described in his Old Testament biography as a priestly member of society who every morning scarified at his private alter for himself and for his immediate family. Job is a patriarch, and you will find if you study the time recorded in the Old Testament histories carefully, that the patriarchs are always present as tribal heads, just as there are kings. A Hebrew patriarch is identical in civic status with a Greek aristocrat or a French noble, and one of the most outstanding facts about their class is that although Hebrew kings die out and disappear between the time of Nebuchadnezzar's attack on Jerusalem with Sennacherib, the patriarchy or aristocracy does not cease to exist, and genealogy itself, the very fact of marriage and births, is the predicate of a patriarchal clan. This is not true of kingship, which must be divinely ordained.
One of the reasons I'm bringing up Germany and its language here is that when reading the Constitution and Bill of rights, it can be hard to see the entirety of the law and keep pivotal points both in focus and in perspective at the same time. One of the hardest concepts in the constitution is the separation of church and state clause in the first amendment. Germany during the Napoleonic wars had an unfortunate traitor remembered to history as "Carl von Clausewitz", a moniker which was applied to him by way of saying, that man is a lawyer who was retained and educated by a scatterbrain who chunked up the laws of the nation into short clauses, or sentence fragments, and used the words contained in them to make irreverent jokes. Both the articles and the amendments are numbered in paragraphs and set in sequential order. It is alas not everywhere understood that both the body of the constitution, penned by a parliamentary secretary, and the amendments starting with the bill of rights are both the constitution, and are to be read as a seamless single law. I will make a scribal note of that now. Another important difference between the Bible and the Constitution is that the constitution is a living document and contains near it's end a description of the lawful procedure for attaching addendums. By direct contrast, the Bible near its end in Revelation specifically prohibits amending it by either addition or subtraction. For the sake of clarity as well as reverence, I will separate the two with language by stating that for our purposes, "The Bible is true, but the Constitution is the law."
Deuton German is a legal standard for educated grammar in the land of the Rhone River, and fans of Ronald "Dutch" Reagan may remember his Moscow Summit arguments and musings on the difference between "German" and "Dutch". "Deutschland" and the name of its language find their etymological roots in Hebrew, and specifically the speech is named after the Mosaic book of Deuteronomy. The stately Garmin of Berlin are quite famous for their attachment to the law. A German, or a Garmin, as described in Tacitus' book "Germania" speaks Duetsch. The designation of his race is "German", and his grammatical or rhetorical language is "Duetsch". Also, from the name of the Book of Deuteronomy, English gets its word "duty". A duty is a requirement, neither the duty itself nor the word for duty in either English or German is related to the words for work or for labor. A duty is to the state, and just as duty also applies to the Levites, so do Levitical requirements apply to both the state per se (members of the government), and to the state as such (all census worth members of the country's population). Job, an Israelite prophet, is described in his Old Testament biography as a priestly member of society who every morning scarified at his private alter for himself and for his immediate family. Job is a patriarch, and you will find if you study the time recorded in the Old Testament histories carefully, that the patriarchs are always present as tribal heads, just as there are kings. A Hebrew patriarch is identical in civic status with a Greek aristocrat or a French noble, and one of the most outstanding facts about their class is that although Hebrew kings die out and disappear between the time of Nebuchadnezzar's attack on Jerusalem with Sennacherib, the patriarchy or aristocracy does not cease to exist, and genealogy itself, the very fact of marriage and births, is the predicate of a patriarchal clan. This is not true of kingship, which must be divinely ordained.
One of the reasons I'm bringing up Germany and its language here is that when reading the Constitution and Bill of rights, it can be hard to see the entirety of the law and keep pivotal points both in focus and in perspective at the same time. One of the hardest concepts in the constitution is the separation of church and state clause in the first amendment. Germany during the Napoleonic wars had an unfortunate traitor remembered to history as "Carl von Clausewitz", a moniker which was applied to him by way of saying, that man is a lawyer who was retained and educated by a scatterbrain who chunked up the laws of the nation into short clauses, or sentence fragments, and used the words contained in them to make irreverent jokes. Both the articles and the amendments are numbered in paragraphs and set in sequential order. It is alas not everywhere understood that both the body of the constitution, penned by a parliamentary secretary, and the amendments starting with the bill of rights are both the constitution, and are to be read as a seamless single law. I will make a scribal note of that now. Another important difference between the Bible and the Constitution is that the constitution is a living document and contains near it's end a description of the lawful procedure for attaching addendums. By direct contrast, the Bible near its end in Revelation specifically prohibits amending it by either addition or subtraction. For the sake of clarity as well as reverence, I will separate the two with language by stating that for our purposes, "The Bible is true, but the Constitution is the law."