Malfeasance

These days it seems like speculative science, pretending to be theoretical observation, is everyone's best sabbath friend providing something to do on the magisterially unenforced day off, but in spite of that fact, morals in one's occupation are a substantial portion of that to which the moral law is applied. Certain criminal acts require either special knowledge to commit or require the criminal to be employed in a particular occupation. If there is a conspiracy occurring, it will be against a specific person, whom the conspirators have selected to operate against, and some acts of the group will require participants coming into possession of exact offices, very specific properties, and non-substitutable real objects, such as desk diaries or proprietary business reports.

Conspiracy, an ex post facto word coinage used to specify to murder of Socrates in Athens, requires espionage in the planning stages and at operating stages along the way to the conspirator's regicide. Please note that stealing information is not a matter of "knowing too much", of "having alternative theoretical notions", or of promoting one's favorite ideas in evangelism or on a political campaign. Espionage is stealing information that is not yours, for example the office secretary's appointment book, the manager's telephone directory, the executive's business diary in which he keeps records of his business meetings and deals, or the blueprints and formulas from the factory foreman's office workstation.

Ad hominim crimes are elitist, if a person or group of person has targets by name as criminals, then the illegal acts will not be random, but preformed on the basis of position in society, corporate position, or real estate address in each case. Some victims are chosen on social status alone, and some crimes require specific educational backgrounds to commit.

Malfeasance: The doing of a wrongful or unlawful act; "a wrongful act which the actor has no legal right to do...as any wrongful conduct which effects, interrupts, or interferes with the performance of official duty;...as an act for which there is no authority or warrant under the law;...as an act which a person ought not to do at all..."

Malfeasance is a character flaw, it is found in evil actors of all stripes, statuses, and in bad characters from all walks of life. In the case of a conspiracy, which is formed by a group of bad people to copy and repeat the treason of Glaucon, the next step is to find and recruit other members who are educated enough and placed in society to commit malpractice.

Malpractice: "A professional's improper or immoral conduct in the performance of duties, done either intentionally or through carelessness or ignorance. The term is commonly applied to a physician, surgeon, dentist lawyer, or public officer to denote negligent or unskillful performance of duties resulting from such person's professional relationship with patients or clients."

Within the judicial branch, possible conspiratorial pursuits include false arrest and malicious prosecution.

Malicious arrest: the arresting of a person on a criminal charge without probable cause, or with knowledge that the person did not commit the offence charged.

Malicious prosecution: an action for recovery of damages that have resulted to person, property or reputation from previous unsuccessful or criminal proceedings which were prosecuted without probable cause and malice.

In all your noble pursuit of philosophy, keep remembering that the answer to "why did that happen" is always a three-line syllogism or series of three-line syllogisms. There are two cause-effect relationships contained within each three-line syllogism. Many people who ask why and try to answer it, including an unfortunate number of theologians, have mistakenly asked "why" when what they meant was "where did that come from". This is especially true when pastors and evangelists try to wax eloquent on the law, which was a difficult task even for Saint Paul, who had a school diploma in it. Preachers very often fall into the fallacy of misrepresenting the axioms themselves as the reasoning about the axioms, when in reality the defined axioms are only linear symbols drawn on Euclid's chalkboard, and the reasoning is done from the five postulates on the three axioms, and as we progress through the book and theorems are derived from the starting three axioms and five postulates, they too can also be used as points of argument.


Every case at law is a series of events contained with a definite interval of time. According to the rules of procedure, a defined interval must be established prior to opening prosecution. The entire trial is judged rationally with respect to testimony from eyewitnesses over the time interval and to material evidence, found at the scene of each crime report within the interval, pertaining to the accused, by eyewitnesses or police. Time and place must coincide, and material findings are required to have been found within the interval of prosecution. At this juncture, I will take a deep breath and explain to you that "The Theory of Relativity of Time and Space" is an attack on due process of law.

Your legalist preacher probably spends a lot of his pulpit time focusing on "divine law", a concept which bears real thought. While divine law is often seen to override local ordinances in the Bible, times at which that occurs are recorded as miracle stories, and the evangelists who focus on them are promoting prayer against state legal ordinances while at the same time just down the atheist driveway, charismatic scientists are presenting and arguing for proofs that such things never occur at all. The difference between the two, divine law and civil law, are described in the founder's writings as being a separate case of "nature, and nature's God". Nature, meaning physics, not only has its own law, which we investigate in solar mechanics so that we can memorize the square law and the inverse square laws of gravity, but it is indeed its own law. Nature's law is recoded in a science book, and no one can change it, although in theology, the professor might have a course on chapter and verse citations of times in the Bible at which God has intervened in human history, for example, the story of the angel who rescued Paul and Sials from prison, or the flood, or the earthquake which killed Korah, Dathan and Abiram for violating procedural ceremony while handling the ark of the covenant. On a national and an international plain and directly referring to the laws of human nature, we can start investigating the separation of powers by delving into the differences between malum in se and malum prohibitum.

Malum in se: evil in itself, "naturally evil, as adjudged by the sense of a civilized community". It refers to "an act or case involving illegality from the very nature of the transaction, upon principles of natural or moral, and public law". For example, murder is malum in se, because even without a specific criminal prohibition the community would think it would be an evil and wrongful act.

Malum prohibitum Wrong because it is prohibited; made unlawful by statue for public welfare, but not inherently evil and involving moral turpitude. Refers to acts prohibited solely by statues. It is contradistinguished from malum in se. For example, driving at excess speeds is malum prohibitum because statues prohibit it as a result of a determination that it is dangerous to the community, though it may not be inherently dangerous, whereas reckless driving would be regarded as malum in se.